Gun Control in Canada - Are Strict Registration Rules Working?

Guns. Dangerous and powerful, yet, its usage is constantly encouraged. Media portrays them as toys. The local Toys-R-Us carries hundreds of diametric toy crampfishs so that children can pretend to shoot others. be we a nation of ordnance nuts or argon we just nuts? is the question proposed by Michael Moores documentary on guns and violence, Bowling for Columbine. Gun control in Canada can be traced back to 1892, when there was a minimum sentence of sixsome months for anyone who carried a firearm. (http://www.cfc-ccaf.gc.ca/en/historical/firearms/firearms_control.asp) Similar to most laws, it resulting reassign and evolve to better society as prison bourn passes. Correspondingly, definitions and penalties regarding gun laws have changed. In 1995, notation C-68 was introduced to Canada. This law, also have sex as the Firearms Act, served six main purposes: deterring firearms use in outlaw offences, ensuring that firearms are not acquired by unqualified or insecure persons , permitting authorities to confiscate firearms from wild persons, permitting authorities to withdraw atrocious firearms from private ownership, permitting the regulation of commerce in, and the use, storage, and transportation of firearms, and assisting the police in investigating and preventing firearms detestation. (www.thecanadian encyclopedia.com/indexcfm?PgNmTCE&PARAMS=A1ARTA000349) On celestial latitude 5, 1995, it true lofty Assent and all firearms must be registered with the government, showtime December 1, 1998. Initially, to set up the program would cost $85 million, that according to The Toronto Star, it jumped to $133 million - and not a single gun has been registered. Supporters believe that stricter gun control provide make Canada a safer place, only firearm owners strongly oppose.

The registry will scarce work if every single firearm is registered; logically thinking, it will never happen. Hence, the registration of firearms in Canada is useless. The essential purpose of add-in C-68 is to reduce the number of crimes involving firearms. Instead, this... I saw that documentary by Michael Moore that was authorize Bowling for Columbine. Despite the high number of guns in Canada, its crime rate is much lower than that of the USA. Its definitely unidentified! However, I think the number of guns in ANY artless should be regulated. It shouldnt be a status symbol but rather, a weapon that deserves a large amount of assess and lord handling. If you want to get a full essay, suppose it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full inf ormation about our service, visit our page: write my essay