Lance Bennett points out in his book News: The Politics of Illusion, Americans today are flooded in intelligence from discussionpapers, publications of every variety, books, broadcast television stations, wireless stations, and cable, including 24-hour cable new outlets such as CNN, C-Span, and CNN Headline News. all the same, the interrogate is raised as to how trustworthy tout ensemble this news is and federal agencyicularly as to how true a picture of society is submited in these many news broadcasts. The question is raised in part because of the growing apathy apparent in the electorate and because of opinion survey which indicate that "many citizens--perhaps the majority--live in a state of wateriness and ignorance about government and political issues" (Bennett 1). Bennett begins with the statement that the news, while all around us, is also superficial. Television news dominates today, and television news in particular tends toward the superficial. Even on stories of substance, television news only has a limited time in which to present the concomitants. In spite of this, however, we are more(prenominal) and more symbiotic on the news. The problem as Bennett sees it is that the media is not serving its track down because the electorate is not well informed. The people tend to be in a passive and uninformed state, basing their decisions not on cosmos but on illusions as propagated by the media. The press has a gatekeeper function that is supposed to serve the public by alerting the people to problems.
 Just as the consumer is k | Canada is also awash in media because of the proliferation of cable and broadcast technology, and television in Canada is also the driving force in news gathering and dissemination: Television simply provides immensely less information than can be provided in a typical daily newspaper. . . Television compensates by abbreviating the information it provides, and by taking great care to select words that give be immediately understood by all earshot members, both in their definition and in their context (Osler 195). Yet it is clear that journalists do influence the events they cover, and the rise of television has make this even more evident as events have bene ordered simply because a camera would be present, demonstrations are more violent when cameras are present, and elections are shaped by the fact that television is the medium of choice. Elections today are conducted so as to take full advantage of media exposure and media opportunities: David Taras notes that there is an political orientation of objective journalism that is very strong and widely legitimate: | Order your essay at
Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment